1Related chat records
The chat records with analysts, agents, or order shouting personnel are the most basic evidence, because this type of evidence can fully reflect the entire process of our victims being deceived, and the illegal and irregular activities generated by relevant analysts or agents during the chat process can be fully reflected in the chat records. Generally speaking, member units or agents are not allowed to shout orders for related external disks, but in fact, many member units or agents have a situation of shouting orders, which is illegal. Some cases still involve financial management for clients, which is even more illegal. The problem encountered in practice is that many parties involved have only partially or completely deleted this type of evidence, resulting in the absence of key evidence and the inability to form an effective evidence chain. Of course, without this key evidence, it does not mean that rights cannot be protected, and rights can still be protected, but the cost of protecting rights will be slightly higher.
2Related transaction records
The entire trading process of investors or fraudsters on trading software can be reflected in the trading records, which can prove the process of capital loss during trading on the exchange or platform. As long as the relevant trading software can be accessed, this trading record can be basically downloaded. However, in practice, many fraudsters are unable to obtain relevant transaction records, mainly because they are unable to log in to the transaction software, and some transaction records have been deleted by the platform, which is also part of the reason. Transaction records are also crucial evidence and are crucial in the process of safeguarding rights, as they serve as evidence to prove illegal transactions on the platform.
3Relevant deposit and withdrawal records
This type of evidence is the inflow and outflow of funds from the investors or the fraudsters' own bank accounts, which can reflect the funds invested by the fraudsters and the outflow situation. The difference between the two is basically the total loss of funds by the investors. Most victims of this type of evidence can save it, just go to the bank and print the bank statement.
以上证据是投资者或受骗者应当具备的基础证据,但不是所有证据。在维权的过程中,如果这些基础证据都没有或不全,那么维权的难度就会增加,但是宸.赫仍然愿意拿起法律的武器来帮你维护你的切身利益!Willing to provide the most professional assistance in safeguarding rights!Promise not to charge any lawyer fees for unsuccessful rights protection!
​