分析师或代理商或喊单人员的聊天记录是最基础的证据,这也是非常关键的证据,因为这类证据能够充分反映我们受骗者受骗的整个过程,相关分析师或代理商在聊天过程中产生的违法违规的地方,能够在聊天记录中得到充分反映。这类证据在维/权过程中至关重要。但这类证据很多当事人只有部分或全部删除了,导致关键证据缺失,无法形成有效的证据链。当然没有了这关键证据,不代表不能维/Power can still be maintained/Right, just dimension/权成本会高一些,只能通过诉讼方式解决,别无他法。
2Related transaction records.
The entire trading process of investors or fraudsters on the exchange software can be reflected in the trading records. This evidence can prove the process of trading or financial loss on the exchange or platform. As long as they can log in to the relevant trading software, this trading record can be basically downloaded. However, in practice, many scammers are unable to obtain relevant transaction records, mainly because they are unable to log in to trading software, and some transaction records have been deleted by the platform, which is also a partial reason.
3Relevant deposit and withdrawal records.
This type of evidence is the inflow and outflow of funds from the investors or the fraudsters' own bank accounts, which can reflect the funds invested by the fraudsters and the outflow situation. The difference between the two is basically the total loss of funds by the investors. Most victims of this type of evidence can save it, just go to the bank and print the bank statement.
以上证据是投资者或受骗者应当具备的基础证据,但不是所有证据。在维/If there is no or incomplete basic evidence in the process of exercising power, then/权的难度会增加。如果相关交易记录没有了,还可以通过其他方式取得。但如果相关聊天记录没有了,那么再想维/权只能由受骗者自己想办法。